Back to all posts

Smart Contracts in the Indian Legal System: A Future-Ready Approach

June 06, 20255 min read

Codex Agents Banner
Image: Smart contracts in the Indian legal system

Introduction

The Indian legal system, rooted in centuries of tradition, is gradually embracing digital transformation. One of the most promising innovations is the adoption of smart contracts—self-executing agreements with terms directly written into code. While blockchain-based contracts are gaining traction globally, their legal standing in India remains a topic of discussion. This post explores the potential, challenges, and regulatory landscape of smart contracts in India.

What Are Smart Contracts?

Smart contracts are programmable agreements that automatically execute when predefined conditions are met. Built on blockchain technology, they offer:

  • Transparency: All parties can verify terms and execution.
  • Immutability: Once deployed, contract terms cannot be altered.
  • Automation: Reduces reliance on intermediaries (e.g., notaries, banks).

Popular use cases include supply chain tracking, real estate transactions, and royalty payments.


Legal Validity in India

India’s legal framework is evolving to accommodate smart contracts:

1. Contract Act, 1872

  • Under Section 10, a valid contract requires offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations.
  • Smart contracts fulfill these criteria if:
    • The code accurately reflects mutual consent.
    • Parties are legally competent.

2. Information Technology Act, 2000

  • Section 10A recognizes electronic contracts.
  • However, blockchain’s decentralized nature isn’t explicitly addressed.

3. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and SEBI

  • RBI has cautioned against cryptocurrencies but hasn’t banned smart contracts.
  • SEBI explores blockchain for securities trading but mandates oversight.

4. Supreme Court Stance

  • In Internet and Mobile Association of India v. RBI (2020), the court lifted the crypto ban, indirectly supporting blockchain innovation.

Challenges

🔹 Enforcement Issues

  • Indian courts may lack technical expertise to adjudicate disputes arising from code errors or hacks.

🔹 Ambiguity in Liability

  • Who is liable if a smart contract fails? The developer, the platform, or the user?

🔹 Regulatory Gaps

  • No specific laws govern decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) or tokenized assets.

Opportunities for India

Efficiency in Legal Processes

  • Property registries, loan agreements, and IP rights management could become faster and fraud-resistant.

Boost to Startups

  • Indian blockchain startups like Matic Network (Polygon) are already global players. Clear regulations could attract more investment.

Global Alignment

  • With the EU’s MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation and UAE’s pro-blockchain stance, India could position itself as a tech-forward jurisdiction.

The Road Ahead

For smart contracts to thrive in India, the following steps are crucial:

  1. Clarify Legal Status: Amend the IT Act or introduce a dedicated blockchain law.
  2. Standardize Code Audits: Ensure contracts are legally and technically sound.
  3. Judicial Training: Equip courts to handle crypto-related disputes.

Conclusion

Smart contracts have the potential to revolutionize India’s legal and business landscape, but their adoption hinges on proactive regulation. As the government explores the Digital Rupee and blockchain pilots, a balanced approach—fostering innovation while protecting users—will be key.

Are smart contracts the future of Indian law? The answer lies in collaboration between technologists, lawmakers, and the judiciary.


Further Reading:

Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.